one for all, and all for one

Hi today I’m going to talk about a serious topic: the current situation in my faculty.
Universidad de Chile has been a one of the most important Educational Institution in our country, but one of the things that it always surprises me is the different quality and quantity of recourses from one faculty to another. The Faculty of Social Sciences (FACSO), where I study has a few recourses; the quality of library is unsatisfactory: very old publications, not enough numbers of copies for title, in some cases only phototocopies. Another things is that we don’t have a study room… we study on the library and all the time one peculiar character make us to be quiet.
Our Faculty is composed of four careers: Anthropology, Sociology, Psychology and Education. But this last career has not a floor like other careers (or classrooms). It’ seems to me so unfair.
Other issue it is the construction of the list of curricular courses of Psychology career to modify the former version it from when the career length six years. Now that it is essay and mistake. Some course of my list of curricular courses seems a joke.
Other problem is the access to career to people who has less: the persons more poor in our country, because the last time the high class has entered to traditional University with more easily than the other group.
The solution to this entire situation is that the University begins to think as one; the recourses join in all University would be to WHOLE University and once and again our study house remember which is: a public, pluralist and a University of excellence.